Tag Archives: Nora Ephron

Humor Columns for Women:  Nora Ephron’s “I Feel Bad about My Neck”

Published in 2006, Nora Ephron’s collection of charming columns, I Feel Bad about My Neck, is a humor classic for women.

In the first essay, Ephron say she feels bad about her neck.  As she and her friends age, the look of their necks change.  They have “scrawny necks and fat necks, wrinkled necks, stringy necks, saggy necks, flabby necks mottled necks.”

She looks around the table and hilariously realizes they’re “all wearing turtleneck sweaters. Sometimes, instead, we’re all wearing scarves, like Katharine Hepburn in On Golden Pond. Sometimes we’re all wearing mandarin collars and look like a white ladies’ version of The Joy Luck Club.”

Aging is not easy for Nora Ephron, journalist, novelist, and director and screenwriter of Sleepless in Seattle and You’ve Got Mail.  Whether it is living in New York, or her glamorous profession as a filmmaker, she must look her best before she steps out of her apartment. 

In “On Maintenance,” she describes her complicated beauty regimen. She gets her hair washed and blow-dried at a salon twice a week. She estimates she spends 80 hours a year there.  

And then there is the hair dyeing.

She says it’s not feminism, or healthy living, that makes women look younger these days.  It is hair dye.  Well… I’ve always worried about dumping chemicals on my head, but that’s probably a result of my tragically hip Women’s Studies class.

Ephron has a different take on it. She says hair dye “is the most powerful weapon women have against the youth culture.”  My gut disagrees, but on a practical level she may be right. 

I’m sure that being in the film industry depends at least partly on looks and appearance. Ephron goes way, way out in her hair-dyeing procedures.   She spends ninety minutes every six weeks getting her hair dyed, and when the hairdresser gives her blond highlights, it extends “the length of time involved in dyeing from unbearable to unendurable.”  But she loves the way it looks, and thinks she is absolutely beautiful, and that her husband wouldn’t recognize her.  Instead, he doesn’t notice. Yes, that’s real life! But she continues to get the blond highlights, time-consuming or not.

 But let’s move on from the beauty regimen. My favorite essay in the collection is about her love of cooking, “Serial Monogamy:  A Memoir.” Charmingly, she has imaginary conversations with her favorite cookbook writers, Julia Child, Michael Field, and Craig Claiborne. The imaginary conversations are so much fun, and seem in line with the creativity of her movies.

In this column, she explains the pressure of imaginary friendships. “…Field was full of prejudice about things like the garlic press (he believed that using one made the garlic bitter), and I threw mine away for fear he would suddenly materialize in my kitchen and disapprove.”

As time goes by, Ephron becomes a relaxed, creative cook, and instead of sticking strictly to the recipe, she adapts it for her convenience .  Best of all, she meets some of the famous cooks who were her imaginary friends. And at the back of her novel, Heartburn, she includes recipes.  

I love her wit and her writer’s voice, and if I’m unable to imagine the life-style, that is my fault, not hers.

On Reading Nora Ephron:  A Few (More) Words about Breasts

It is always a pleasure to read Nora Eprhon. I love her humor writing, think her  journalism is even better, and am a fan of her comic films.

Ephron was a brilliant writer who sensed or knew what was going on in women’s minds.  And thus she gave us When Harry Met  Sally”  (the orgasm scene), You’ve Got Mail (the-kleenex-thrown- around-the-apartment scene), and Julia and Julia (the many, many cooking scenes).   I have seen her movies multiple times, and think it’s time to go back and watch You’ve Got Mail, because the protagonists own bookshops, and there’s something political going on in the bookshops, circa the late ’90s.

However, her funny, satiric but mostly serious essay, “A Few Words about Breasts,” is my favorite In the collection, Crazy Salad: Some Things about Women.

Her short, partly sardonic essay addresses the concerns of women who have small breasts. She grew up in the 1950s when breast size was, to women and men, an essential sign of female attractiveness. Ephron kept waiting for her breasts to grow, and they did not.

The ’50s and ’60s were also the age swimsuits came with built-in rubber bras. I had a swimsuit with a built-in rubber bra when I was 10. I had small breasts, and didn’t understand why I needed a built-in bra to go swimming, so I didn’t give it a thought.  But soon there was the hysterical insistence on wearing a bra.  Even in college, a friend asked, “Why do you bother to wear one?”  I hadn’t noticed till she said it, but her husband was staring at my breasts. This was a first for me, and I was embarrassed that she, one of my best friends, had thought I did it deliberately. And when I got home I looked in the mirror and realized my bra was almost transparent, so you could see my nipples  The next day I bought another bra. You couldn’t see my nipples through it, which was my goal.

When I was growing up, there was less worry about breast size than in Ephron’s day. What I noticed was that girls with bigger breasts called them boobs, proudly. I definitely didn’t have boobs. “The boobettes,” as a friend called them, were bragging and trying to make small-breasted girls feel bad for not having boobs.

I thought, Wait a minute.  I have breasts, if not boobs..  I considered stripping right there on the hockey field to show them that I did indeed have breasts. I also once had a boyfriend who affectionately referred to my “petite breasts.”

Do small breasts count as breasts? That was the question often seemingly raised by big-breasted women. Nora Ephron bought three different padded bras in high school, of three different sizes, which surely must have been noticeable, but no one said a thing about it. She came to school wearing a different padded bra every week but no one said a word about it.

She points out that there is a competition among women about breasts.  “You’re so lucky,”a friend said.  “My boobs are so big they hurt my back,” On another occasion, a woman complained that men liked her only for her breasts.  Again, I said nothing, though I sensed that men find women beautiful in proportion to their breast size.  But I didn’t like those guys much anyway. And then there was my favorite: If I didn’t wear a bra when I went jogging it would ruin my breasts, make them sag, hurt my muscles.

What she said was patently untrue, but I fear she was flaunting the fact that her own breasts would sag and get ruined (why would she be proud of it?).

I have a few unvoiced responses to women’s competition with women: 1. (Looking concerned:) “I’m sorry for your pain;” 2 (smiling brightly): “Don’t let the bastards get you down,” and 3) Catullus never wrote about  Lesbia’s breasts. Isn’t that charming?”

Now Catullus is the one who would get them, don’t you think?

But perhaps women with boobs aren’t very smart. That’s a comment that’s almost as monstrous as criticizing women with small breasts.

I never think about my breast size, and I imagine Ephron forgot about it, too.

It’s times like this that we feel grateful that we don’t really need a bra.